Sorry for the late post people! Happy Monday!!
There are several things that stood out for me in today's reading.
1. Jephthah was the son of a prostitute. He was sent away from his family because he was an illegitimate son, yet is later called back to save his family from the Ammonites. God uses Jephthah. He is presumed to be of worthless lineage and yet in 11:29 "the Spirit of the Lord came upon Jephthah". No matter how worthless we are in our human sin and lineage, God can send his Spirit upon us and make us great warriors.
2. Did Jephthah seriously provide his daughter as a burnt offering?! God knew Jephtah's vow to sacrifice the first thing that came to his door - why did God send his daughter?? This does not seem to align with what I know of our God? I did a lot of reading on interpretations surrounding this vow. I choose to highlight the discussion found Here.
One of the more troubling passages of the Old Testament has to do with a vow made by one of Israel’s judges, Jephthah, as recorded in Judges 11. Jephthah vowed to God that if the Lord would grant him victory over the evil Ammonites, the first thing that came out to meet him upon his return home, would be Jehovah’s, and/or it would be offered as a burnt sacrifice. When he arrived home, his daughter came out to greet him. He was devastated, but eventually he fulfilled the vow.
It is generally assumed this means that he did sacrifice her as an offering. Some conservative scholars argue vigorously that he fulfilled his vow and took her life (see Kaiser, pp. 193-195). Some of their arguments are as follows.
- It is contended that almost all early writers believed that Jephthah did actually sacrifice his daughter. The idea that he dedicated her to perpetual virginity, it is said, commenced in the Middle Ages.
- The era in which Jephthah lived was exceeding corrupt, and he was no different from the others of that age.
- It is alleged that the grammatical construction of 11:31 allows only human sacrifice coming from his house, not an animal.
- The actual sacrifice of his daughter is the most natural way to interpret the context.
Possible Considerations
There are two possible approaches to this problem. First, if Jephthah offered his daughter as a burnt sacrifice, he did so without God’s approval, for the law of Moses condemned human sacrifice (Deuteronomy 18:10). The writer of the book of Hebrews would not have endorsed that particular atrocity any more than he would have sanctioned Abraham’s lying (Genesis 12:10ff), or Rahab’s prostitution (Joshua 2:1ff). Reporting an event is not the equivalent of sanctioning it. The allusion in the book of Hebrews would reflect a characterization of Jephthah’s life of faith, viewed in its entirety, and would not discredit him simply because of an isolated (though horrible) act of sin, the fulfillment of a rash vow.On the other hand, a number of prominent scholars (e.g., Edersheim, Archer, Geisler, etc.) believe that Jephthah did not sacrifice his daughter as a burnt offering; rather, it is argued that he devoted her, as a virgin, to the service of Jehovah for the remainder of her life.
In support of this view, a number of arguments are proffered.
Human sacrifice against the law
Since human sacrifice was clearly a violation of divine law, does it seem likely that Jehovah would have granted Jephthah’s victory (Judges 11:32), knowing that such would result in a gross, pagan tragedy?No condemnation
There is no condemnation of Jephthah’s act in the record of Judges or elsewhere. This seems rather strange in view of the fact that another judge’s heathen conduct is reprimanded (see the case of Gideon — Judges 8:27).Idiomatic language
The “and” (Heb., vau) of verse 30 may be an idiom in the sense of “or” (cf. Exodus 21:15 in the LXX [v. 17 Eng. text] — “he who curses his father or his mother shall be put to death”). Thus, this Old Testament character may have been merely suggesting that whatever met him as he returned home would be dedicated to Jehovah, or, offered as a burnt offering — depending upon which was appropriate. See Dr. Hales’ comments (Clarke, p. 153).The maiden’s behavior
The girl went into the mountains to bewail her virginity, not her impending death (11:37).If she knew she was about to die, why did she spend the final two months of her life in mountain solitude, rather than remaining with her family (11:36-37)?
Puzzling language
Jephthah fulfilled his vow (11:39). If this meant he killed her, why was it necessary to add, “and she knew not [i.e., she was not intimate with] a man”?Jephthah’s daughter: a heroine
Each year thereafter the daughters of Israel “celebrated” (the word can mean to “praise”; cf. “rehearse” — 5:11) Jephthah’s daughter (11:40). Would this have been the case had she voluntarily offered herself as a sacrifice in a pagan ceremony in plain violation of the will of God?One respectable scholar, Goslinga, who contends that Jephthah did actually kill his daughter, concedes that the “perpetual virgin” view is also possible. He says that the fact that Jephthah continued in his judgeship after the incident favors this view. In fact, the law of Moses imposed the death penalty upon anyone who sacrificed one of his children to Molech (Leviticus 20:2).
If Jephthah had sacrificed his daughter — even to the Lord — it is difficult to see how many of the Israelites would not have strongly reacted against that atrosity. Goslinga says the Bible exegete must exercise caution in this regard, rather than being dogmatic (p. 396). For a balanced discussion of this incident, see McClintock & Strong (pp. 818-820).
What are your thoughts about this story?? Other articles I found said that Jephthah should be celebrated because he went through with his vow, others say it was an "off the cuff" vow and not of the Holy Spirit at all and that one should not make careless promises and vows to God without seeking Him out first. Good advice for sure, but do you think it applies here?
I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
Tomorrow's passage: Judges 13-15, Luke 15:1-10
6 comments:
The notes in my Bible also point out that Jephthah would have had to bring her to a priest to make his sacrifice, according to the Mosaic Law, but that no Levitical priest would have supported and participated in the offering a human sacrifice because it was strictly forbidden. There seems to be greater evidence, in my opinion, to support the theory that she was given over to temple service for the rest of her life rather than that she was literally sacrificed as a burnt offering.
One of the reasons Jephthah may have been so upset about his rash promise is that since she was his only child, his family line had absolutely no hope for continuation, which was a pretty big deal. He may not have been upset because he had to kill her, but because he was cutting off any remaining hope of there being a son-in-law or future grandson who would keep his land in the family.
I definitely think there is more than ample evidence to support the theory that she was given over to temple service for the rest of her life and not offered as a burnt offering.
But it was also obviously a rash vow and a reminder that we need to think before we speak, because even careless vows need to be fulfilled (unless doing so would be sinful)
I agree with both of you that there is more evidence that she was given over for temple service. And that would have been hard for Jephthah to reconcile no descendants to carry on his lineage!
It must've been really hard to accept someone else making a vow for you that affects your whole life! No wonder she wanted to go mourn for 2 months.
I would agree that she was likely not sacrificed. Nowhere does it specifically say she was killed, and as the information Jody included states, it says she mourned that she would never marry, not that she was going to die. It definitely should make us think twice about making rash promises! I feel quite bad for Jephthah.
I also noticed that God chose Jephthah, the son of a prostitute, and not one of the other legitimate sons. No one is more or less worthy depending on the circumstances of their birth of being used by God. I find it really annoying that one of the reasons my husband has no interest in church is because the Anglican minister during his catechism classes before his confirmation told him he'd never amount to anything because his parents weren't married when he was born. Talk about scarring a kid for life.
Woah. Add this to the stories I have never read before. I am thankful for all of the information you shared. I think there is more evidence to support that she became a temple servant. I think she may just have kept on running for those 2 months instead of returning home if she was going to be killed. I also think that the lineage aspect played a much bigger role than it would now and that is why the reaction was so strong.
Miriam...that is terrible! How could someone say that when the person they are saying it to has and had no control over the situation?! So sad.
Post a Comment